Targeted patch-clamp recordings and single-cell electroporation of unlabeled neurons in vivo (2024)

References

  1. Koch, C. & Segev, I. The role of single neurons in information processing. Nat. Neurosci. 3 (suppl.), 1171–1177 (2000).

    Article CAS Google Scholar

  2. Häusser, M. & Mel, B. Dendrites: bug or feature? Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 13, 372–383 (2003).

    Article Google Scholar

  3. Jagadeesh, B., Gray, C.M. & Ferster, D. Visually evoked oscillations of membrane potential in cells of cat visual cortex. Science 257, 552–554 (1992).

    Article CAS Google Scholar

  4. Margrie, T.W., Brecht, M. & Sakmann, B. In vivo, low-resistance, whole-cell recordings from neurons in the anaesthetized and awake mammalian brain. Pflugers Arch. 444, 491–498 (2002).

    Article CAS Google Scholar

  5. Brecht, M., Schneider, M., Sakmann, B. & Margrie, T.W. Whisker movements evoked by stimulation of single pyramidal cells in rat motor cortex. Nature 427, 704–710 (2004).

    Article CAS Google Scholar

  6. Chadderton, P., Margrie, T.W. & Häusser, M. Integration of quanta in cerebellar granule cells during sensory processing. Nature 428, 856–860 (2004).

    Article CAS Google Scholar

  7. Svoboda, K., Denk, W., Kleinfeld, D. & Tank, D.W. In vivo dendritic calcium dynamics in neocortical pyramidal neurons. Nature 385, 161–165 (1997).

    Article CAS Google Scholar

  8. Waters, J., Larkum, M., Sakmann, B. & Helmchen, F. Supralinear Ca2+ influx into dendritic tufts of layer 2/3 neocortical pyramidal neurons in vitro and in vivo. J. Neurosci. 23, 8558–8567 (2003).

    Article CAS Google Scholar

  9. Helmchen, F. & Denk, W. Deep tissue two-photon microscopy. Nat. Methods 2, 932–940 (2005).

    Article CAS Google Scholar

  10. Margrie, T.W. et al. Targeted whole-cell recordings in the mammalian brain in vivo. Neuron 39, 911–918 (2003).

    Article CAS Google Scholar

  11. Dittgen, T. et al. Lentivirus-based genetic manipulations of cortical neurons and their optical and electrophysiological monitoring in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 18206–18211 (2004).

    Article CAS Google Scholar

  12. Denk, W. & Detwiler, P.B. Optical recording of light-evoked calcium signals in the functionally intact retina. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 7035–7040 (1999).

    Article CAS Google Scholar

  13. Euler, T., Detwiler, P.B. & Denk, W. Directionally selective calcium signals in dendrites of starburst amacrine cells. Nature 418, 845–852 (2002).

    Article CAS Google Scholar

  14. Nevian, T. & Helmchen, F. Calcium indicator loading of neurons using single-cell electroporation. Pflugers Arch. 454, 675–688 (2007).

    Article CAS Google Scholar

  15. Haas, K. et al. Single-cell electroporation for gene transfer in vivo. Neuron 29, 583–591 (2001).

    Article CAS Google Scholar

  16. Rathenberg, J., Nevian, T. & Witzemann, V. High-efficiency transfection of individual neurons using modified electrophysiology techniques. J. Neurosci. Methods 126, 91–98 (2003).

    Article Google Scholar

  17. Denk, W., Strickler, J.H. & Webb, W.W. Two-photon laser scanning fluorescence microscopy. Science 248, 73–76 (1990).

    Article CAS Google Scholar

  18. Stuart, G.J., Dodt, H.U. & Sakmann, B. Patch-clamp recordings from the soma and dendrites of neurons in brain slices using infrared video microscopy. Pflugers Arch. 423, 511–518 (1993).

    Article CAS Google Scholar

  19. Koester, H.J., Baur, D., Uhl, R. & Hell, S.W. Ca2+ fluorescence imaging with pico- and femtosecond two-photon excitation: signal and photodamage. Biophys. J. 77, 2226–2236 (1999).

    Article CAS Google Scholar

  20. Loewenstein, Y. et al. Bistability of cerebellar Purkinje cells modulated by sensory stimulation. Nat. Neurosci. 8, 202–211 (2005).

    Article CAS Google Scholar

  21. Waters, J. & Helmchen, F. Background synaptic activity is sparse in neocortex. J. Neurosci. 26, 8267–8277 (2006).

    Article CAS Google Scholar

  22. Stuart, G., Schiller, J. & Sakmann, B. Action potential initiation and propagation in rat neocortical pyramidal neurons. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 505, 617–632 (1997).

    Article CAS Google Scholar

  23. Svoboda, K., Helmchen, F., Denk, W. & Tank, D.W. Spread of dendritic excitation in layer 2/3 pyramidal neurons in rat barrel cortex in vivo. Nat. Neurosci. 2, 65–73 (1999).

    Article CAS Google Scholar

  24. Larkum, M.E. & Zhu, J.J. Signaling of layer 1 and whisker-evoked Ca2+ and Na+ action potentials in distal and terminal dendrites of rat neocortical pyramidal neurons in vitro and in vivo. J. Neurosci. 22, 6991–7005 (2002).

    Article CAS Google Scholar

  25. Zhu, J.J. & Connors, B.W. Intrinsic firing patterns and whisker-evoked synaptic responses of neurons in the rat barrel cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 81, 1171–1183 (1999).

    Article CAS Google Scholar

  26. Theer, P., Hasan, M.T. & Denk, W. Two-photon imaging to a depth of 1000 micron in living brains by use of a Ti:Al2O3 regenerative amplifier. Opt. Lett. 28, 1022–1024 (2003).

    Article CAS Google Scholar

  27. Jung, J.C. et al. In vivo mammalian brain imaging using one- and two-photon fluorescence microendoscopy. J. Neurophysiol. 92, 3121–3133 (2004).

    Article Google Scholar

  28. Stosiek, C., Garaschuk, O., Holthoff, K. & Konnerth, A. In vivo two-photon calcium imaging of neuronal networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 7319–7324 (2003).

    Article CAS Google Scholar

  29. Ohki, K. et al. Functional imaging with cellular resolution reveals precise micro-architecture in visual cortex. Nature 433, 597–603 (2005).

    Article CAS Google Scholar

  30. Miyawaki, A. Innovations in the imaging of brain functions using fluorescent proteins. Neuron 48, 189–199 (2005).

    Article CAS Google Scholar

  31. Hasan, M.T. et al. Functional fluorescent Ca2+ indicator proteins in transgenic mice under TET control. PLoS Biol. 2, e163 (2004).

    Article Google Scholar

  32. Trachtenberg, J.T. et al. Long-term in vivo imaging of experience-dependent synaptic plasticity in adult cortex. Nature 420, 788–794 (2002).

    Article CAS Google Scholar

  33. De Paola, V. et al. Cell type-specific structural plasticity of axonal branches and boutons in the adult neocortex. Neuron 49, 861–875 (2006).

    Article CAS Google Scholar

  34. Zhang, F. et al. Circuit-breakers: optical technologies for probing neural signals and systems. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 8, 577–581 (2007).

    Article CAS Google Scholar

  35. Joyner, A.L. Gene Targeting: A Practical Approach 2nd edn. (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, UK, 2000).

Download references

Targeted patch-clamp recordings and single-cell electroporation of unlabeled neurons in vivo (2024)

FAQs

What is the patch clamp technique in vivo? ›

This technique allows us to obtain stable recordings of excitatory and inhibitory synaptic currents evoked in single neurons in vivo under voltage-clamp conditions and action potentials and synaptic potentials under current-clamp conditions.

What is the patch clamp technique for neurons? ›

The Patch-clamp technique is a versatile electrophysiological tool for understanding ion channel behavior. Every cell expresses ion channels, but the most common cells to study with patch-clamp techniques include neurons, muscle fibers, cardiomyocytes, and oocytes overexpressing single ion channels.

What is in vivo single cell electrophysiology used to measure? ›

Different types of in-vivo electrophysiological techniques allow for recording of action potentials, or spikes, produced by single neurons, or larger scale signals that reflect summated synaptic activity or action potentials recorded from many neurons at once.

What is the difference between patch-clamp and intracellular recording? ›

Conventional intracellular recording involves impaling a cell with a fine electrode; patch-clamp recording takes a different approach. A patch-clamp microelectrode is a micropipette with a relatively large tip diameter.

What is the purpose of the patch clamp recording? ›

The patch clamp method is a refined electrophysiological technique that can directly measure the membrane potential and/or the amount of current passing across the cell membrane.

What are the disadvantages of patch-clamp technique? ›

Disadvantages include a higher access resistance, relative to whole-cell, due to the partial membrane occupying the tip of the electrode. This may decrease current resolution and increase recording noise.

What are the advantages of patch-clamp technique? ›

Patch-clamp (see Glossary) recording provides direct and precise measurements of electrical activity, such as membrane potential and current density, at the single-cell level. These methods can generate rich datasets and offer flexibility to explore disease mechanisms and characterize pharmacological effects [70].

How does automated patch clamp work? ›

The automated patch clamp robots execute preprogrammed protocols to fill the patch clamp substrate with electrolyte solutions, add cells in suspension, seal onto a cell, break through to the whole-cell configuration and perform voltage-protocols in the absence and presence of drugs while recording the ionic currents.

What is cell-attached patch-clamp used for? ›

Cell-attached recording, in which a patch electrode is attached to the cell but the membrane is not broken, has been widely used for recording single channel currents, for recording the summed current of many single channels in a patch of membrane, and for recording spontaneous cell firing activity.

What is in vivo testing used for? ›

"In vivo" means research done on a living organism, while "in vitro" means research done in a laboratory dish or test tube. Both types of studies are used by medical researchers developing drugs or studying diseases.

What is the purpose of in vivo diagnostic? ›

In vivo diagnostic testing is a procedure that is performed in the body to identify a disease or medical condition. Introducing the in vivo diagnostic biological into the body will elicit a response which is observed or measured and determines the result of the test.

What are the methods for single cell recording and labeling in vivo? ›

Sharp intracellular, juxtacellular, loose-patch and whole-cell approaches are some of the configurations used to record and label individual neurons. Here, we review procedures to establish successful electrophysiological recordings in vivo followed by appropriate labeling for post hoc morphological analysis.

What is the patch clamp method of neurons? ›

Patch clamp techniques for investigating neuronal electrophysiology. Patch clamp electrophysiology is used to study the electrical properties of excitable cells and ion channels. In patch clamp experiments, suction is used to attach a micropipette filled with electrolyte solution to the cell membrane.

Can patch clamp be done in vivo? ›

With the development of in vivo patch-clamp recording, especially in vivo voltage-clamp recording, researchers can not only directly measure neuronal activity, such as spiking responses or membrane potential dynamics, but also quantify synaptic inputs from excitatory and inhibitory circuits in living animals.

What is a patch clamp used to measure membrane potential? ›

Patch-clamp technique originated from technique of voltage clamping, which can be applied with an electrode inside of the glass pipette to record the measuring of the voltage alterations in cell membrane. Current in the ion channels has been recording by tip of specific prepared patch pipette.

What is the patch-clamp technique for dialysis? ›

Patch-clamp technique. In the patch-clamp technique, a low resistance (2–10 MΩ) glass microelectrode is attached to the cellular plasma membrane, and then the required voltage or current is measured.

What is the patch clamp method used to study? ›

Joern Steinert, University of Leicester

Patch clamp electrophysiology is used to study the electrical properties of excitable cells and ion channels. In patch clamp experiments, suction is used to attach a micropipette filled with electrolyte solution to the cell membrane.

Is patch clamp in vitro? ›

The patch clamp technique is an electrophysiological technique that enables to study the electrical properties of living cells.

What is the cell attached patch-clamp technique? ›

Patch-Clamp Techniques

In this configuration, a patch-pipette is sealed to an intact cell. This configuration allows measuring the current through the channel(s) in the membrane patch within the pipette tip. This is possible because of the high resistance (R) of the patch (Rpatch).

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Recommended Articles
Article information

Author: Maia Crooks Jr

Last Updated:

Views: 5976

Rating: 4.2 / 5 (63 voted)

Reviews: 94% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Maia Crooks Jr

Birthday: 1997-09-21

Address: 93119 Joseph Street, Peggyfurt, NC 11582

Phone: +2983088926881

Job: Principal Design Liaison

Hobby: Web surfing, Skiing, role-playing games, Sketching, Polo, Sewing, Genealogy

Introduction: My name is Maia Crooks Jr, I am a homely, joyous, shiny, successful, hilarious, thoughtful, joyous person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.